

I read in the paper yesterday though that, as ever, everybody cannot be pleased. When the summer list of a local high school contained a book controversial because of the subject matter, and a minute fraction of the parents complained, the solution was simple. The school board just abolished the list completely and each student was to pick any one book he liked and read it. One book! Let's hope it's not written by Dr. Seuss.
I am still a fan of lists, and they guide some of my reading to this day. One such list, The 50 Essential Mystery Novels that Everyone Should Read, caught my eye last week and, along with the classical favorites written by Agatha Christie, Conan Doyle and Wilkie Collins, I found When We Were Orphans by Kazuo Ishiguro (Knopf, 2000).
Having read and enjoyed The Remains of the Day and a few other Ishiguro novels, I was surprised to see a novel from this author that fit into the crime-writing genre. I couldn't wait to read it. Ishiguro always reminded me of Henry James, but I liked him better because I enjoyed what he had to say as much as the way he said it.
The story begins before 1920 in Shanghai, China. Christopher Banks is leading an idyllic childhood and spends most of his time in the international compound of a city in turmoil. This was during the time of the early rise of the Red Chinese party, which was trying to gain a foothold in an area where the Japanese and British concerns already had deep roots. Banks's father worked for a British company actively involved in the importation of Indian opium.

One day, his father simply disappears. While the authorities are doing their best to find him, his mother disappears as well. Christopher is sent back to England to stay with family, and there he grew up, went to Oxford and got on with his main ambition––which is to be a great detective.
This is what he manages to do in the spit-spot fashion recommended by Mary Poppins. All the details that the reader gets is that Banks solved this or that famous case and was becoming something of a celebrity in the society of London. I must say that excluding any details of his cases made his frequent patting himself on the back rather pointless. Once he feels affirmed in his notion that he is indeed a great destroyer of evil, he decides to return to Shanghai to discover the fate of his parents and solve the great mystery of his life.
It is at this point that Ishiguro begins the real purpose in this book. He subtly reveals his study into the inner working of an uncomfortable mind.

Thomas Wolfe said it best: "You can't go back home to your family, back home to your childhood. . . back home to a young man's dreams of glory and of fame .. . back home to places in the country, back home to the old forms and systems of things which once seemed everlasting but which are changing all the time––back home to the escapes of Time and Memory."


This doesn't change my belief that lists have a place in our lives, and they encourage knowledge of what's out there for readers in this age of vanishing bookstores. I have great fun perusing many of the lists of books at the Goodreads site categorized for one reason or another, including lists like the "worst book you will ever read," as well as "the most anticipated books of the year." A nice fillip is that the readers are continually working on these lists by voting for their own favorites.
I saw that same list and was pleased to see that I actually had read some and had a few others in my own TBR! I've not read any of Kazuo Ishiguro's works, though, and think I should probably add this one to the list now too.
ReplyDeleteJust to say that I have read an Ishiguro, that is.
ReplyDelete